Communications Equipment
2025Fiscal year
Companies 49
Median of average pay per registered director · KRW 198 million
| Company | Notes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hanwha Vision | KRW 123 million | KRW 1,219 million | 3 | 1,060 | |
| Zaram Technology | KRW 102 million | KRW 380 million | 3 | 52 | |
| Ubiquoss | KRW 80 million | KRW 213 million | 3 | 190 | |
| Mercury | KRW 78 million | KRW 224 million | 2 | 135 | |
| BG T&A | KRW 77 million | KRW 351 million | 2 | 62 | |
| Sena Technologies | KRW 72 million | KRW 198 million | 2 | 113 | |
| Ranix | KRW 71 million | KRW 110 million | 4 | 80 | Filer note attached |
| Intellian Technologies | KRW 71 million | KRW 867 million | 3 | 500 | |
| Lightron Fiber-Optic Devices | KRW 70 million | KRW 119 million | 8 | 66 | |
| Opti Core | KRW 70 million | KRW 103 million | 5 | 38 | Filer note attached |
| RFHIC | KRW 69 million | KRW 240 million | 3 | 256 | |
| Gigalane | KRW 68 million | KRW 234 million | 2 | 179 | |
| Solid | KRW 68 million | KRW 406 million | 3 | 333 | Filer note attached |
| CS | KRW 68 million | KRW 186 million | 3 | 45 | |
| LIG Accuver | KRW 67 million | KRW 153 million | 4 | 446 | |
| FR Tek | KRW 67 million | KRW 248 million | 2 | 33 | |
| Catis | KRW 67 million | KRW 177 million | 4 | 81 | |
| Samji Electronics | KRW 64 million | KRW 543 million | 2 | 124 | Denominator mismatch flagged |
| Asia Pacific Satellite | KRW 64 million | KRW 145 million | 2 | 183 | |
| Coweaver | KRW 64 million | KRW 435 million | 3 | 159 | |
| ICTK | KRW 62 million | KRW 266 million | 2 | 70 | |
| Commax | KRW 62 million | KRW 210 million | 4 | 130 | |
| Woori-Net | KRW 62 million | KRW 163 million | 3 | 239 | |
| Taihan Fiberoptics | KRW 60 million | KRW 266 million | 3 | 250 | |
| HFR | KRW 59 million | KRW 187 million | 4 | 172 | |
| 3A Logics | KRW 59 million | KRW 239 million | 6 | 48 | |
| Exicure Hitron | KRW 57 million | KRW 38 million | 6 | 32 | |
| Kisan Telecom | KRW 56 million | KRW 100 million | 3 | 60 | |
| OE Solutions | KRW 56 million | KRW 119 million | 4 | 155 | |
| KMW | KRW 55 million | KRW 137 million | 3 | 69 | |
| Eyesvision | KRW 54 million | KRW 280 million | 3 | 57 | |
| Ace Technologies | KRW 54 million | KRW 181 million | 3 | 259 | |
| Kocom | KRW 54 million | KRW 184 million | 3 | 151 | |
| Sensorview | KRW 54 million | KRW 329 million | 3 | 73 | |
| Piolink | KRW 53 million | KRW 150 million | 5 | 434 | |
| Jahwa Electronics | KRW 53 million | KRW 447 million | 3 | 1,585 | |
| DG-ITX | KRW 52 million | KRW 62 million | 7 | 76 | |
| Joongang Advanced Materials | KRW 52 million | KRW 50 million | 5 | 108 | |
| Han Wool Materials Science | KRW 50 million | KRW 71 million | 8 | 52 | |
| Davolink | KRW 50 million | KRW 6,095 million | 5 | 88 | Denominator mismatch flagged |
| Opticis | KRW 48 million | KRW 208 million | 3 | 99 | |
| The Technology | KRW 48 million | KRW 51 million | 3 | 28 | |
| Licomm | KRW 47 million | KRW 86 million | 3 | 47 | |
| RN2 Technologies | KRW 46 million | KRW 317 million | 7 | 112 | |
| Dasan Networks | KRW 44 million | KRW 480 million | 2 | 182 | |
| Inno Instrument | KRW 44 million | KRW 148 million | 3 | 27 | |
| Korea Advanced Materials | KRW 41 million | KRW 40 million | 3 | 38 | |
| Oneul E&M | KRW 40 million | KRW 43 million | 5 | 97 | |
| Hyundai HT | KRW 37 million | KRW 456 million | 2 | 192 |
Before reading this table
- Figures collect the filed per-person averages without transformation, and can differ from totals divided by headcounts.
- Listed filers only, and consolidated subsidiaries' staff are not included.
- These are filed values whose accuracy the source institution does not guarantee.
- Company rows reproduce each filer's own reported values without transformation, and this site computes none of them.
- Where few registered directors are covered, the per-person average approaches a few individuals' pay.
- Sharing an industry code does not mean doing the same work.
- Filed values on the wrong digit scale are converted to a common basis against the company's own filings in other years, and where no basis exists the reason shows instead of an amount.
- Classifications with thin samples publish no median or weighted industry figure, while the employee average is shown regardless of sample size alongside the company count.
Industry groupings and names follow Naver Finance's sector classification. The per-company figures themselves reproduce annual-report filings.